• JP brings together several critical factors in the development of an effective school.

  • JP works with schools providing training on how to ameliorate teacher weaknesses brought to light through the process of teacher evaluation.

  • JP partners with schools and districts across the country to provide intensive professional development for scientifically-based programs.

  • JP Associates offers our sites grant writing assistance. Take advantage of our experience writing successful grant requests.

  • Common Core State Standards, Factors Influencing Student Achievement, Responsive Coaching, Teacher Evaluation, Autism
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

JP Associates, Inc
The School Improvement Specialists
Sign up for our Newsletter 

(516) 561-7803
Fax (516) 561-4066

Follow Us facebook-logo twitter-logo youtube-logo

After But, it is all downhill!

“That is a great idea, but….”

“I agree with you a 100%, but….”

“I really liked what you did, but…”

“He/she is really a great, but…”

How many times have we heard those words or how many times have we said them to others?   We all know what comes after the “but,” and it is usually negative. That “but” sucks all the positive out of the first part of what we are saying.  It says:

“I don’t really think it is a great idea.”

“I don’t agree with you a 100%.”

“I don’t really like what you did.”

“They are really not that great.”

It is what people can hear and remember and often this is not our intention (except for those passive aggressive people).

The root of this kind of communication may come from behavioral research that says something along the lines of suggesting we provide 5 positives to every negative and this is a good practice.  The issue is the “but.”  

Three Strategies You can Use

ONE: Keep the positives. It is a great way to reinforce the behaviors we want to see.  How do we decide on what behaviors we want to reinforce? Briefly, those behaviors should be identified and shared as part of the vision you have created with your staff (topic for another blog post).

TWO: Drop “but” from your vocabulary! Look for other words like however or better yet, turn the “but” into a question. The following questions can help build relationships, actively involve both you and the other person in the process and let the other person know their thoughts are valued.

  • What was your thinking behind what you just did?
  • What were you trying to accomplish?
  • Can you tell me more?
  • What other ways do you think you could approach this issue?
  • How do you think you can improve this process?
  • Can I share some ideas with you that you might find effective and useful?

Three: Ask for feedback and then, reflect.  I always ask people if the feedback made sense to them.  Was it relevant to their needs? Could I have made it clearer? Feedback is not always easy to hear and sometimes I can get defensive, so that is why I, you, need to set time aside for reflection. I resist the temptation to respond immediately, other than thank you.  Take time to reflect on what I should take and use.  I go back to the person and am specific in thanking them for what was useful and helpful.  In addition to reinforcing the relationship, it models how they should look at and use feedback.


One of the objectives of feedback is to help foster change either toward a specific goal or for general improvement.  When we don’t provide feedback in a supportive and positive way, neither is accomplished.  An adaptation of a Mahatma Gandhi quote: Whenever we give feedback, give it with kindness and be truthful-with the intent to help, otherwise the message and the messenger will be ignored. 


3 Delivery Techniques Every Teacher Should Know

The title for this blog post was going to be 3 Secrets Every Teacher Should Know, but there should be no such thing as secrets when it comes to instruction. For teachers and students to excel, there are no secrets, just shared knowledge of what works.

It is not only what we teach that is important, but how we teach it, how we deliver the instruction. Here are three field-proven techniques that will make your instruction more effective and increase student performance.


Verifying is echoing a student’s correct exact response so the whole class hears another repetition of the correct answer. For example:

Student Response:  “All sentences start with a capital letter.”

Teacher Verification:  Yes, all sentences start with a capital letter.

The teacher then adds another perfect repetition by turning the verification into a group response question:

Teacher: “What do all sentences start with?”

Group response:  “A capital letter”

Teacher: Yes, all sentences begin with a capital letter.

This is instructional feedback that verifies the students and takes the place of “good job’” or “very well done.” While that is very positive feedback, it is not instructionally useful.

Pause & Punch

Another powerful technique is in the way you deliver your instruction.  In the following sentence, the words that should be emphasized are in underlined italics.

By simply emphasizing key words in your questions or directions, you can increase the probability of first-time correct responses and reduce the chance of student confusion.

Here are two examples, one for Math and one for Reading:

Math: Students are shown a pie graph.        

 pie chart

Teacher directions: “You’re going to write a fraction for the picture.  First you’ll write the number that tells how many parts are in the unit. Is that the top number or the bottom number?


Students read, “There was never anything for Edna to do on the ship after it left the harbor.  Sometimes she would sweep up or help with the meals, but most of the time she just sat around and looked over the side of the shop at the swirling water,”

Teacher asks: What did Edna do sometimes on the ship?  What did she do most of the time?

Not everything we say as teachers has the same importance. If we can pause before the key instructional words and then punch those words out by saying them louder, that prompt can guide students to the correct response. In this reading example, our naive students could definitely confuse what Edna did sometimes as opposed to what she did most of the time. By pausing and punching on sometimes and most that prompt can prevent that confusion from happening.

Call and Response Reverse:

As students read, you sometimes need to jump in with a quick definition of a word to help them completely understand the text.  You then question the students, reversing the definition and word—causing students to attend to it and remember it better with just an investment of a few seconds.  In his book, Teach Like a Champion, Doug Lemov calls this technique a “call and response reverse.”


Students read the sentence: “The sweet perfume of the roses immediately attracted the bees.”

The teacher interjects- and uses lots of effective pause and punch AND verification of responses- to clarify two words:

“The sweet perfume of the roses attracted bees immediately. Perfume is a scent or smell.  What word means scent or smell?”

 Students respond, “Perfume”

Teacher verifies: “Yes, perfume.  What is perfume?”

Students respond: “A scent or smell.”

Teacher verifies: “Yes, perfume is a scent or smell.”

Teacher continues: “The sentence says the sweet perfume of the roses attracted bees immediately. If the perfume attracted the bees, the smell really interested the bees and pulled them toward the roses. Everybody, what word means really interested the bees?”

Students respond:  Attracted.

Teacher verifies:  “Yes, attracted.  What does attracted mean?”

Students respond: “Really interested.”

Teacher verifies: “Yes, attracted means really interested. So, this sentence would mean the same thing if it said, ‘The sweet scent of the roses really interested bees.’”


Remember Practice Make Permanent.  If students practice something the wrong way, they learn it and remember it the wrong way.  If they practice the right way, students achieve mastery. ONLY perfect practice makes perfect permanence and leads to mastery. The three techniques shared here help ensure perfect practice.

Friday Reflection: Be the Change

Time for our Friday Reflection. If you are a leader, you are involved in change. The question is, are you involved in change as an outside facilitator or are you part of the change? Are you willing to change as well?

“…the system in place is ideally suited to producing the results the school is currently getting…any change in the desired results, from the current system in place is going to require a change in mission, core beliefs, and core values that underpin the system, especially if the goal is to permanently sustain the desired change.” Lezotte

Be the Change

• Remember, you, too, are part of the system you are trying to change.

• Have you reflected and identified the changes you need to embrace? Are you modeling them for your staff-leading by example?

• OR, do your actions despite your desire for creating change support the system in place?

• If so this should help you understand how others are feeling about change. Walk a mile in their shoes.

• How often do you leave the safety of your office and routine to go out and see what is going on?

• Do you engage with people without bias? Accept the fact that insights can come from the person you value the most AND from the person you disagree with the most. Don’t limit your information gathering.

Enjoy your Memorial Day Weekend!

We Can Do It!

Imagine we found a cure for cancer and didn’t use it! Or a cure for the common cold and didn’t use it. People would be incensed.  That is how Ron Edmonds felt about creating effective schools:

“We can whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need to do that. Whether or not we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact we haven’t so far. “

The question is why and at least part of the answer can be found in people’s resistance to change. One of the better ways to overcome resistance is to explain the change and let people know how they will benefit from the change.

Ron Edmonds, Wilbur Brookover, and Larry Lezotte developed a body of research that support these basic beliefs

  • All children can learn & come to school motivated to do so
  • Schools control enough of the variables to assure that virtually all students do learn
  • School should be held accountable for measured student achievement
  • Schools should disaggregate measured student achievement to be certain that students, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status, are successfully learning the intended school curriculum
  • The internal & external stakeholders are the most qualified & capable people to plan & implement the changes necessary to fulfill the “learning for all” mission.

What are the Seven Correlates?

In their search for what makes schools effective, the researchers first identified effective schools (“schools that were successful in educating all students regardless of their socio-economic status or family background”).  Then they identified common traits of these schools. These were culled down and are known as the Seven Correlates of Effective Schools:

  1. Instructional Leadership
  2. Clear and Focused Mission
  3. Safe and Orderly Environment
  4. Climate of High Expectations
  5. Frequent Monitoring of Student Progress
  6. Positive Home-School Relations
  7. Opportunity to Learn and Student Time on Task

Instructional Leadership

In this post, we are going to look at Instructional Leadership. 

Instructional Leaders:

  • Place a priority on promoting growth in student learning
  • Make instructional quality the top priority of the school and take the necessary steps to make that vision a reality
  • Foster and lead learning teams/communities that meet regularly
  • Work with their staff to discuss work and data
  • Collaborate with staff on problem solving
  • Develop leader among their teachers
  • Take responsibility for what students learn

Instructional leaders exhibit the following behaviors (Blase and Blase-2000):

  • Make  suggestions
  • Give feedback
  • Model effective instruction
  • Solicit opinions
  • Support collaboration
  • Provide professional development opportunities
  • Give praise for effective teaching


Ron Edmonds: There may be schools out there that have strong instructional leaders, but are not yet effective; however, we have never yet found an effective school that did not have a strong instructional leader as the principal.

How to make your students beg for more practice!

In a prior post we looked at repetitions as practice and the importance of practice in achieving mastery.  See the May 17th post Tell Me What You Did Wrong (http://jponline.com/jp-blog ). In this post we are going to revisit the idea of 10,000 hours of practice and learn how practice can be both effective and fun by making practice a game. 

Good, Better, Best:

After students read a list of words correctly teacher can introduce this game.  Remember it is important to make sure students have the reading of the words correct before practicing-we don’t want them practicing incorrect decoding because then we would need to re-teach.  In addition to losing instructional time for the re-teaching, it will take three times as many repetitions for the student to internalize the correct answer.

  • After the first reading of the list, say, “That was good, but I bet you can read them even better” Have students repeat the list.
  • Then say, “That was better. Let’s do it again. This time give me your best”. The added practice will help to develop the automaticity necessary for fluent reading.

Top Down, Bottom Up:

Another way to add repetitions to word calling is to have students read every list from top to bottom and then from the bottom to the top. The teacher can make this fun by calling it “Top down, bottom up” and presenting it enthusiastically.

Beat the Computer:

PowerPoint can also be effective ways to give added practice. The teacher challenges students to “Beat the Computer”- a game they love. The PowerPoint displays a word; the children say the word before a picture appears. The PowerPoint then moves to the next word. This type of practice can be used for Math Facts, names of letters, sight words, and vocabulary. Actually, it is only limited by the teacher’s creativity.

Here are examples for practice of basic math facts and for decoding.


With the math facts, the problem appears, students say the answer and then, the correct answer flies in. For example:

  • Students see the problem 3+4; they say the answer, and then, the number seven flies in.
  • The next problem appears, 3+5; students say the answer, and then, the numeral 8 flies in.
  • Continuing, the problem 3+6 appears, students say the answer, and then, the 9 flies in.


With the reading example, the word appears, students decode it and then the picture flies in. For example:

  • The letters d-o-g appear, the students decode and say “dog” and then the picture of the dog appears.
  • Next, the letters d-u-c-k appear, the students decode and say “duck” and then the picture of the duck appears.
  • Finally the letters m-a-n appear, the students decode and say “man” and then the picture of the man appears.

10,000 Hours

We have all heard the adage, “Practice makes perfect.” This is inaccurate. It is more accurate to say that Practice Makes Permanent. If we practice something the wrong way, we learn it and remember it the wrong way. That is why we, as teachers, should not assign items for homework that are either new or have been confusing for certain students to internalize. We have no idea how our students are practicing those items. ONLY perfect practice makes perfect permanence and leads to mastery.

Another way to think of MEANINGFUL repetitions is Practice. In the book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell says that it takes roughly ten thousand hours of practice to achieve mastery in a field. How does Gladwell arrive at this conclusion? And, if the conclusion is true, how can we leverage this idea to achieve greatness in our students?

Gladwell studied the lives of extremely successful people to find out how they achieved success. Please listen to the results of this study: (Fly in picture of violinist)

In the early 1990s, a team of psychologists in Berlin, Germany studied violin students. Specifically, they studied their practice habits in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. All of the subjects were asked this question: “Over the course of your entire career, ever since you first picked up the violin, how many hours have you practiced?”

All of the violinists had begun playing at roughly five years of age with similar practice times. However, at age eight, practice times began to diverge. By age twenty, the elite performers averaged more than 10,000 hours of practice each, while the less able performers had only 4,000 hours of practice. The elite had more than double the practice hours of the less capable performers.

Natural Talent was Not Important

One fascinating point of the study: No “naturally gifted” performers emerged. If natural talent had played a role, we would expect some of the “naturals” to float to the top of the elite level with fewer practice hours than everyone else. But the data showed otherwise. The psychologists found a direct statistical relationship between hours of practice and achievement. No shortcuts. No naturals.

Find Us on Facebook!

JP’s Services

  • Detailed Needs Assessment
  • Customized Professional Development
  • Grant-writing
  • Strategies for serving students with Autism
  • Creating a positive school/classroom culture
  • Leadership training and coaching
  • Common Core State Standards
  • Effective Instructional Practices
  • Differentiating Instruction
  • Effective Reading Instruction
  • Job-embedded, side-by-side, onsite coaching

Login Form